Creation Bullet Series: Destroying Darwinism, One Bullet at a Time
“God is not the author of confusion but of peace…” — 1 Corinthians 14:33
Original Creation Bullet by Bill Nowers:
Evolutionists frequently resort to games and fuzzy thinking to support their never proven beliefs. An example: I believe that infinity equals one. In the equation zero times infinity equals zero. (any number times zero would equal zero) Then divide both sides by zero and we have infinity equals one. (zero cancels out on the left side and any number divided by itself would be one.) Therefore, that proves creation. Take that evolutionists. And by the way, if you are a math whiz and question the example, no dissent is allowed.
Does that sound stupid? Of course it does: A bit of satire to give an example of the fuzzy thinking used by evolutionists. Some real examples: In the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) book, “Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science,” six pages, 68 to 73, are devoted to explaining the logic in determining that if five numbers of a dice are showing, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, then the unseen number is 5. Wow! Or, in another NAS book “Science and Creationism, A View from the National Academy of Sciences,” a map of the known world, as it appeared in Columbus’s day (on the back cover) is way out of touch with the world as we now know it from a picture in space (on the front cover). And this, they say, discredits creation. No dissent allowed.
God’s creation ended after six days and all species continued to evolve, only within their own kind (microevolution). Evolutionists not only deny this, they claim everything started by chance with the Big Bang and some kind of spontaneous generation of life. All of this in spite of solid evidence that macroevolution is impossible. Even Darwin claimed he had no evidence for macroevolution, but claimed changes to a new species were assumed.
The National Academy of Sciences also attempt to support evolution by association. Their book, “Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences,” stated on page 6, “Theories that are supported by evidence and…survive the rigorous testing of the scientific method are passed on to future generations. Examples are the germ theory,…the theory of gravity,…and the theory of evolution.” And of course the only proof of evolution is microevolution. But this they will not admit.
We would appreciate your donation.Hang in there Christians. The end is in sight. For Darwinian evolutionists, that is.
One of the most frustrating tactics used by defenders of evolution is what Bill Nowers rightly calls fuzzy thinking—a misuse of logic, satire, and scientific jargon that distracts from the real issue: evolution cannot account for the origin or complexity of life. In this second Creation Bullet, Nowers highlights how evolutionists regularly appeal to analogies and misleading illustrations rather than hard evidence. Why? Because there is no hard evidence for macroevolution.
The National Academy of Sciences, often treated as an unimpeachable source of scientific wisdom, devotes pages to simplistic illustrations like guessing the hidden side of a die or comparing old maps to modern satellite images. These examples have no bearing on the creation-evolution debate but are used to imply that belief in creation is outdated and unscientific. It’s not reasoned argument—it’s propaganda.
From Satire to Subversion: How Logic Gets Twisted
The satirical math analogy Nowers opens with is intentionally absurd—yet it perfectly mirrors the irrational logic often embedded in evolutionary arguments. When you redefine terms, avoid direct evidence, and protect your views from dissent, you’ve abandoned science. This is not the pursuit of truth—it’s the preservation of a narrative.
Evolutionists routinely smuggle in assumptions under the guise of observation. They blur the line between microevolution (variation within kind) and macroevolution (one kind turning into another), using the observable to justify the impossible. Even Darwin himself admitted he lacked evidence for species-to-species transitions, and instead assumed they had occurred.
Evolution by Association: A Deceptive Sleight of Hand
One of the more dishonest strategies employed by evolutionary textbooks is what Nowers calls “support by association.” The National Academy of Sciences equates the theory of evolution with the germ theory and the theory of gravity—ideas backed by direct, testable evidence. But unlike gravity and germs, no one has ever observed macroevolution. By lumping these theories together, they hope to borrow credibility that evolution has not earned.
This tactic is deeply misleading. It trains students and readers to accept evolution as fact by association, not by actual demonstration. The only proven form of biological change is microevolution—adaptation within a kind—which creationists wholeheartedly affirm. That’s not evolution in the Darwinian sense. It’s simply God-designed flexibility built into His creation.
Truth Is on the Side of God’s Word
Let us not forget: the entire evolutionary framework depends on chance, time, and unproven assumptions. God’s Word, by contrast, tells us plainly: “Each kind reproduces according to its kind” (Genesis 1:24-25). Creation was finished after six days, and while creatures may vary within kinds, no new kinds have ever been observed.
“Hang in there Christians,” Nowers says. “The end is in sight. For Darwinian evolutionists, that is.”
Let’s continue to stand firm, confident that when the fog of fuzzy thinking lifts, the light of truth will shine even brighter.
Next week: Creation Bullet #3 — “Who’s Really Behind the Evolution Agenda?”
Explore more at the VCA Young Earth Creationism page →
About the Author – In Memoriam
Bill Nowers (1925–2021) was a long-time VCA Board Member and founder of Creation & Evolution Science Ministries. His legacy of defending biblical truth lives on through this powerful series.
Read more about Bill →
