Playback speed:
This article marks the launch of another installment in our U.S. Constitution series, where we examine today’s legal and political battles through the dual lens of the Founding Fathers’ intent and a biblical worldview. As modern America tests the pillars of liberty, we ask: What does God’s design for justice, authority, and truth reveal about the nation’s direction? In this post, we confront a growing Constitutional Showdown between the Executive and Judicial branches over critical issues, such as birthright citizenship.
Constitutional Showdown: Who Decides Who Becomes an American?
By Jeff Bayard | Constitutional Showdown Series
The Constitutional Showdown over birthright citizenship came to a head after President Trump issued an executive order (EO) intended to clarify the scope of the 14th Amendment. Within days, federal courts intervened. This article unpacks the legal and constitutional stakes at play, rooted in our Founders’ original vision.
Constitutional Showdown: What Just Happened
President Trump’s executive order (EO) sought to end the practice of granting birthright citizenship to the children of non-citizens and illegal immigrants. The order emphasized that the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause does not apply to individuals whose parents owe no allegiance to the United States.
Within hours of the announcement, U.S. District Judge Deborah L. Boardman issued a nationwide injunction, declaring the executive order likely unconstitutional. In the days that followed, three additional federal judges issued similar rulings. While activists hailed the decisions as a defense of equal protection, others saw them as further evidence of judicial overreach undermining the authority of the presidency.
Constitutional Showdown: What the Constitution Says
The 14th Amendment reads:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States…”
That phrase—”subject to the jurisdiction thereof”—is not filler. It’s the constitutional hinge point. According to the authors of the 14th Amendment, this clause was designed to exclude foreign diplomats, hostile forces, and those owing allegiance to another country.
Legal scholars from the Claremont Institute, the Heritage Foundation, and the Center for Immigration Studies argue that modern interpretations have stretched this clause far beyond its original intent, transforming a narrow guarantee into a sweeping entitlement.
The Courts and the Constitutional Showdown
This case is about more than immigration. It reflects a deepening power shift—one where unelected judges increasingly dictate what elected Presidents can or cannot do.
Yes, courts hold the authority to interpret the law. But when judges issue nationwide injunctions to block Executive Orders—before allowing full judicial review or public debate—they distort the design the Founders intended.
The Judiciary is not to function as a veto chamber over the Executive Branch.
The Founders’ Vision for the Constitutional Showdown
The Founders envisioned three coequal branches with separate powers. The Executive branch enforces the law, not asking permission from federal judges. And citizenship? That was meant to be a solemn act rooted in allegiance and loyalty, not merely in geography.
Senator Jacob Howard, who introduced the 14th Amendment, stated that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” did not include foreigners or those with divided allegiance.
In short, today’s interpretation of the Citizenship Clause would likely baffle the very men who wrote it.
Why the Constitutional Showdown Matters to You
If judges can block a President from defining who qualifies for citizenship… what else can they block?
- School choice
- Border security
- Protection for Christian business owners
Every time a judge bypasses due process and nullifies executive authority, your vote becomes less powerful, and your country a little less sovereign.
A Republic Worth Preserving
At VCA, we believe in both Scripture and the Constitution. Romans 13 reminds us that governing authority comes from God, but it must remain within its bounds. When one branch assumes powers that don’t belong to it, liberty itself begins to erode.
This fight isn’t just about immigration—it’s about preserving the design of our Republic. And it begins by restoring the words of the Constitution to mean what they were intended to mean.
Constitutional Cross-Check
- Clause in question: 14th Amendment – Citizenship Clause
- Founder’s Intent: “Jurisdiction” excludes those with no political allegiance
- Current Conflict: The Judiciary issuing nationwide injunctions against Executive Orders
- Focus Keyphrase: Constitutional Showdown
Our calling as believers is to discern the times and stand for truth. We encourage you to leave a comment below and share your perspective on this pivotal issue. What would justice and righteousness look like in our immigration laws today? And how can we restore constitutional integrity while honoring God’s sovereignty?
Stay tuned for more in our Constitutional Showdown series as we continue to expose modern power struggles—and reclaim biblical foundations in public life.
